Dynamic Hexcrawl Required Reading: An Echo Resounding

For this next "required reading" post, I'm going to eschew historical context and talk about a modern resource that I think does a great job of handling the hexcrawl: Kevin Crawford's An Echo, Resounding: Lordship and War in Untamed Lands for the Labyrinth Lord system. These days, it's hard to find an Old School-positive individual who's not familiar with Crawford's work, but if you're not, here's the deal: Kevin is probably most famous for his Stars Without Number and Other Dust RPGs, but what he does is adapt old school rules to different sorts of genres with minimal modification from a basic LL-powered chassis (SWN is pretty much LL in space whereas OD is a hard scifi post-apoc LL). Sure, he's famous for some of the bigger coups of his career (like releasing all of the art from his last three successfully Kickstarted RPGs to the public domain -- or is it open source? I don't know, I should probably check it out), but to me the big thing that he's done is this: by using some simple natural-language descriptors (he calls the "tags," just like the internet does), you can quickly turn a verbal description or impression of a thing/place/person/whatevs into a usable game element. Bam, simple.

An Echo, Resounding (hereafter AER) tackles the hexcrawl from the perspective of this tag system. The logic applied is largely: let's paint the setting with broad strokes and give brief descriptions to the big things in it, then we can discover the rest through play, translating the words that we've used to describe what we've encountered into gamable elements that we can interact with from a rules standpoint. Hmm. It should not be a surprise that I enjoy this approach.

Crawford spends a lot of his book talking about the Domain Management side of the game. For once, I'm not going to tread there, however much I want to. This series is about the hexcrawl itself, not the Domain Game, so I'm going to step off. Well, other than to say that I fucking love the way that Crawford handles the Domain Game and that if I weren't running ACKS as the engine of my current Domain-centric campaign, I'd totally be using at least parts of this one. There you go, we're done. On to the hexcrawl.

Crawford doesn't suggest any one method for generating your map, nor does he state that a hexmap is necessary. Rather, he suggests vague mappery that instead of focusing on particulars focuses on the board-strokes details: where are the towns? Where are the castles? Where are the major resources, dungeons and monster lairs? Crawford is focused less on the "how you get there" and more on the "what's at the end of the journey," which ties in more to his idea of the sandbox as a backdrop for domain play, and less into my own concept of the sandbox as an adventure opportunity in and of itself.

The big place where I see AER filling an important role is in the development of several key features of any given sandbox: the book includes a few different dimensions that your standard sandbox features -- towns, lairs, ruins, resources, etc. -- can be developed along, as well as the consequences of those developments. For example, a town might have been settled by xenophobes, and while that's not exactly the most socially desirable trait, it does have some benefit (specifically +2 Social using AER's Domain Management system) and that plays out in game terms. The town will also have an "activity" that generally describes the course that society is taking there, as well as an obstacle to overcome. Bam, you've got a nice sandbox location. This pattern is repeated for lairs, ruins and resources.

I'm especially keen on the inclusion of resources as a sandbox detail. It makes sense to me that there are things out there -- mines, forests, guano caves, whatever -- that confer some sort of benefit on their owner. It feels like a lot of other Domain Games either handwave these aspects or shoehorn them into another facet (I feel ACKS tends to abstract this to be part of a domain's Land Value), but I think they should be more important than they tend to be. If I want my vikings to build a bunch of fucking longboats, I'd better have access to a ton of lumber. It just makes sense. I like that Crawford makes simple things that make sense important in the game.

It's stuff like this -- easy, natural-language stuff that makes logically important details systematically important -- that really stand out in my brain as I start building a hexcrawl and they help drive the systems that I've put in place to help me do it.